JW: I really think, well… Let’s not call this “sexism.” Let’s call it an “asymmetrical judgment” between men and women. If Henry Miller writes “Tropic of Cancer” and calls the hero “Henry Miller,” he’s still allowed to say these are novels, and none of the guys question it. Because a man is allowed to be bigger. A woman isn’t. She can only possibly talk about herself.

BNR: Meanwhile, Anaïs Nin is just writing “journals.”

JW: Journals, right, journals! If I want to use myself as a fictional character, why can’t I? Over the years, it’s been one of the most frustrating things. If you call yourself “Jeanette” in the novel, then it’s all about you. And I’m thinking, No. This is a person I’ve invented. Why shouldn’t I? That’s what I mean by an asymmetrical judgment because Paul Auster, Henry Miller, Milan Kundera, any of those writers who quote themselves directly, Philip Roth, for God’s sake! We all say, “That’s so great! That’s so interesting!” But if you do that as a woman, it becomes confessional and autobiographical.

jeannette winterston with the barnes and noble review. OH MY GOD YES. YES. YES. FUCKING THIS. (via isabelthespy)

124 notes

Show

  1. trenchantashell reblogged this from earlyfrost
  2. mxnotmrdarcy reblogged this from impromptuonedykedanceparty
  3. sickelgaita reblogged this from impromptuonedykedanceparty
  4. impromptuonedykedanceparty reblogged this from youarenotyou
  5. earlyfrost reblogged this from zemonstashaus
  6. zemonstashaus reblogged this from youarenotyou
  7. kittensandscience reblogged this from unquietly
  8. youarenotyou reblogged this from heroin-e
  9. apatheticfan reblogged this from mymilkspilt
  10. windupbirdchronicle reblogged this from alexandraerin
  11. mymilkspilt reblogged this from kathleenjoy
  12. kathleenjoy reblogged this from poetbabble
  13. alexandraerin reblogged this from emilytheslayer
  14. cloacakiss reblogged this from will-graham-i-am
  15. emilytheslayer reblogged this from will-graham-i-am
  16. will-graham-i-am reblogged this from desliz